DESCRIBE HOW THE WORKPLACE HAS ALTERED OVER THE LAST 100 YEARS.

(With emphasis on the post-nuclear period).

 

“Technocrats are the dominant elite rather than the Bourgeoisie, and developments in microelectronics, and intellectual technology are encouraging this process” Bell (1974), cited by Rowe (1990) People & Chips. P17.

 

            This essay will discuss what changes have evolved in the common workplace, looking at both industry and commerce. The pre-nuclear period will be briefly discussed, but emphasis will be placed mainly from the 1950s to the present day. Technological ‘milestones’ will be used to discuss the effect of that technology upon the workplace of that era. To separate the workplace from the impact of these technological inventions would imply that  ‘All technology was good for all people’.

            The office could well be said to have started with the first (known) cuneiform writing and recording onto clay tablets, of the creation myths of the ‘Enuma Elish’ by the Babylonians (600BC.) This was probably the first permanent ‘event’ recording to be re-used by other people to give what was once seen as a true story.  From here through Egyptian and Arabic scriptology, we have our basic means of recording and storing of information for future use.  The use of the written word by hand was until the Victorian era our only way of saving data, and in the Victorian era formed the basis of commercial business.  Bell (1973) says “That cheap repetitive printing in the 19th century did allow some commercial firms to make their yearly statements available to potential investors”.

The working conditions of the time were amply portrayed by writers of the era such as Charles Dickens et al. From this pseudo historical description, we are led to believe, that all 18th/19th-office work was labour intensive and laborious. The workplace was usually a section within the merchant’s city house, so that direct control of all the office was immediate.  The hiring of lesser well off cousins and nephews  (male only) usually made up the office staff of this time.  The poverty of this ‘lesser family’ ensured their continual humility of labour, and their acceptance of poor working conditions. 

In industry too, the factories where also labour intensive in spite of the use of some degree of automation (i.e. Cotton spinning etc.) The centralisation of workers away from cottage industries (which the factories had under cut), into collective workplaces controlled by others was in full swing in this period.  Therefore by the 1900s we saw the start of ‘employee collectives’ as a prerequisite for progress, (apart from the singular craft trades).  This collection of like skilled people corralled within a business, was deemed profitable for the employer irrespective of the feelings of the individual worker.

            Throughout the early 20th century little or no progress was made in either workplace.  Factories became more labour intensive (WW1 fuelled this).  Heavy productive industries such as coal and iron production became the means of estimating a countries progress, and the manual worker was seen as the lowest common denominator.  The office workplace remained for the greater part an area of pen and ink ledgers, although the early ‘Standard’ upright typewriters were being introduced for outside mailings by the bigger commercial companies.  The introduction of the mechanical ‘Adding-Machine’ by IBM in (1952) (called the ‘Comptomometer’) was seen as a major invention, in its time. This invention removed the need for so many clerks in offices and banks, and perhaps can be seen as the first of the worker/automation losses of later years.  Thus the stage was set for the next 20+ years with little in the way of inventions that would move the workplace forward.   Perhaps at this early stage (1930s) the division of working skills between the blue-collar manual worker and the so-called white-collar office worker became a factor.  This divergence of skills and means of production would now forever divide the common workers, with each seeking a separate and better wage structure from the other.  Many offices were moved away from the factory site, and thus gained status as a clean area of work, although with lower productive skills than that of the industrial worker.

The invention of the ’Electric Stepping Relay’, (a telegraph selection and routing device), and the use of the ‘Thermionic Valve’ as a switching diode (apart from its then present use as a detection device for radio waves) was to have a profound effect by the 1940/50s.  Its effect upon the workplace was quite profound.  The ability of companies to communicate with customers at a cheap rate became an important office tool.  Many companies even set up large switchboards, which gave employment to a new class of worker, ‘The Telly-girls’.  Thousands of women where hired by the then ‘Post Office’ for its national and international boards.  This sort of work (with its need for privacy and confidentiality) however was strict and authoritarian, with almost no promotion prospects, but it did provide ‘respectable’ employment for women.

The effect of World War II. had hastened the need for the use of high speed switching devices to help with code breaking (Enigma) (it used Thermionic Valves, which failed frequently and generated a lot of heat).   The breakthrough came at Bell Laboratories in 1947. Three researchers (Bardeen, Brattain and Shockley) invented the ‘Transistor’ using germanium doped with an impurity that could be used as a switching diode or amplifier without the restrictions imposed when valves where used. Large (1984) says, “The first digital computer using discrete components was built at Bell Labs. in 1958 by Felker” This fact was singularly, the greatest forward invention that would change the workplace forever.  Bell (1973) gave this era as the start of the post-industrial society.  He says “The post industrial society was characterised by a shift from goods producing to service industry, and by the codification of theoretical knowledge, with knowledge and innovation serving as the strategic and transforming resources of society, just as capital and labour had been in earlier industrial society”.  

 As Bell Laboratories was the research arm of  ‘Bell Telephones’ the first use of the transistor was to revamp the telephone and telegraph systems. (Used extensively in the first place to replace the old electro-mechanical relay systems).   The use of transistors (now using other crystal substrates as well as germanium) has allowed high speed switching and routing of the automatic exchange. This new technology was heavily used by the modern workplace, and has replaced the older manual switchboards and of course the need to hire switchboard operators  (cost savings plus, plus in wages etc.)  Automatic telephone switching is probably the first use of technology, not only to improve communications, but also as an example of cost and manpower reduction in the modernised workplace.  Forester (1990) says “That entire female workforces were replaced by these automatic exchanges, although the need for highly qualified electronic (as opposed to Electro-mechanical) engineers arose”.

            Following the automatic telephone exchanges, came the need to produce an instrument to replace the old mechanical typewriter so beloved of the ‘Typing Pools’ which formed the basis of a companies permanent record keeping and ordering system.  The advent of the electrically driven typewriter improved speed, but any mistake in a document usually meant re-typing the whole document all over again (Expensive and time consuming etc.).  IBM in (? 1963) stuffed a rather crude memory card into one of its ‘Selecta’ typewriters and coined the word ‘Word-Processor’ This allowed some correction of errors if caught early on in the script, and of course was the forerunner of the word processor we use nowadays. 

The invention of the chip-technology expanded, whereby ‘etching’ a strip of substrate, allowed more and more transistors,  (plus their associated resistors and condensers) to be incorporated into recognised and repeatable outcome modules. These modules where made to interconnect in such a way that memory and function became integrated.  Thus was born the first computer proper.

            Early use of the computer entered the workplace in two main forms, which were to completely revolutionise the average and even mundane workplace. Firstly, the electronic calculator, which promptly ousted the mechanical calculator. Secondly came the computerised word processor that later allowed a typist full control over her output, with its self correcting spell checkers etc.  The combination of both inventions allowed a composite structure that even today forms the basis of the modern office.  The calculator  ('Electronic Tabulator') was the result of IBM research; their work on cash registers gave it the skills to move over into adding machines, and later into word processors (along with many other companies).  The use of adding machines revolutionised the work place, and reduced the errors of human calculation.  Forester (1990) points out that, the new electronic adding machines “Had the ability to perform accurate, repeatable manipulation of quantitative data, and as such were bound to replace many office workers who used to do these repetitive jobs by hand”, and of course it created many workplace casualties, mainly in the large insurance companies and banks.  They rapidly replaced their army of back office clerks in favour of these ‘Tabulators’.  This again increased company profits but can only be seen as a detrimental act against its workplace employees.

            The introduction of the dedicated word processor met exactly the needs of nearly every office, and became (and still is) the most central form of office automation.  However if we believe that one-day we will have a paperless office, then its days must be numbered, but at the moment remains the office backbone.  Coupled with a built in fax, telephone selectors, Internet ready (in a commercial sense only), rapid inter-office communication becomes an easy accomplishment, and a daily occurrence.   Not every employee was happy with this. Martin (1995) says “When a computer/word processor was given to each manager to use, they revolted.  They felt they could not do without their own secretary. (Who was retrieved from the typing pool and returned to the manager’s office)? Snobbery, self-importance.  It seems that not even technology can remove some long-standing privileges if you are a manager”. 

The use of a word processor coupled into a ring network has obviated the need for each worker to have his or her own desk. They could simply take any free desk, sign on and commence work.  This was seen as a social insult by some of the workers, who felt that their company no longer valued them as individuals.  In some companies this loss of personalised ‘space’ induced almost a degree of grieving, and personal productivity was reduced.  Uncaring office managers saw it as a cost saving venture and it still persists even to day in large clerking companies. (I.e. Pools checking, telephone service centres etc).  Surely at this stage the workplace lost its friendliness, and became simply a means of earning an income. (With the least input, probably).

            In the industrial workplace the use of electronic profiling became the norm with a huge loss of the previously skills acquired through years of apprenticeship.  We are all aware of the huge robotic profile machines that work 24hrs a day in isolated factory warehouses, served only by the (often-singular) 'electronic engineer'.  These machines work in total darkness unaided.  Large (1984) says, “The robotic factory, as such is cheap to construct, as it does not have to meet any human health and safety rules, (no loos, drinking water, fire escapes etc, windows, ventilation etc.)  Any changes in the work done by these machines can be downloaded from distant engineering offices”.  Replacement raw materials arrive automatically from ‘just in time’ automated warehouses, and so on, ad infinitum.  Thus the working place of the traditional manual worker is becoming almost extinct for the masses.  (Apart from assembly plants at the moment, but even these are gradually moving over to robotic-automation).  These changes will no doubt be progressive, and may in time become a precursor, for a loss of masculinity in the male, as the main breadwinner within the family unit.

            The modernisation of the once skilled factory workplace has created a change within the gender of it participants. There has been an increase in female employment, which is seen as a cheap alternative to the once expensive skilled male worker.  Many modern workplaces have become simple assembly lines for component placement (i.e. Television assembly lines, White goods etc.).  This work is relatively unskilled, and therefore part time married women, whose demands are easier to meet, can populate the workplace.  Generally the female part time worker is poorly paid, with neither job satisfaction, or guaranteed continuity of employment.  Large (1984) cites gross changes in the workplace for females. He says

 “The use of computer checking (through the use of computerised scanners) at ‘Vernons Pools’ has reduced what was once a ‘family’ job (Mother and Daughters etc. working together locally) has now become a mind numbing scanning job with work targets set each week.  The checking offices have moved away from the city where people live, and the work is done in huge converted warehouses.  The workforce has reduced by 80%, but the workload has increased many times over, for the same wages”

            Large (1984) gives many other instances of work-place changes brought on by computerisation of a process.  All these changes reduced operating costs, and of course raised profits. But none of them where done for the betterment of the worker. 

By combining faster processor’s with stacked storage devices, It became possible to create huge multi use machines; (Mainframes) the output processing power of the computer was also increased many times.  These machines grossly changed the workplace. Their size necessitated the formation of a specialised corporate structure (‘The IT Department’).  In the 80s the age of the huge mainframe computer was seen as the ideal control centre, within which the entire workplace, whether industrial or commercial would be controlled from.  These powerhouses soon became ‘temples’ of almost ‘Geakish’ proportions to which management paid homage. The average worker was now really only seen as an acolyte, to feed the mainframe. These IT departments within many corporations were created, with special buildings, whose hygienic housing standards rivalled that of an  ‘Operating Theatre’.  To become a programmer in them was seen as the ultimate career path, the IT manager him/herself was soon moved onto the board of directors.

This movement towards the integration of a central singular megalith was seen by most average workers as the holy grail, and no matter what they thought, the workers working practice was changed to meet it needs.  In fact these mainframes became the perfect excuse for bad working practices.  Sloppy workmanship within the office was often trotted out as a computer fault.  Customers complaints where often met with the same excuse.  Such was the haste for their incorporation, that computer fraud rose upon the backs of bad programming practices, (backdoor access etc.).  It was an even stranger fact that this fraud was seen by many as an expected  ‘blokey-bloke’ thing, which was often hidden away from shareholders and customers alike, (for fear of adverse publicity). Authors such as Forester (1990), Large (1984), Martin (1995) and Rowe (1990) write at great length of fraud within the workplace.  The possibility of large-scale fraud has certainly changed the workplace.  Even routine typists are spied upon through their feeder LANs.  Finance department run ‘audit trails’ on all their finance staff.  Software authenticity is audited weekly etc.  Thus the workplace has become a place where the management mistrusts their employees as a matter of routine, and the ‘Board’ mistrusts their management ad infinitum.

In the 1980s Taylor (1980) cited in Rowe (1990) advocated his concept of the workers role in the workplace. Taylor proposed his system of ‘Taylorism’ “In my system, the worker is told minutely what he is to do and how he is to do it, and any improvement upon the instructions given to him is to be considered fatal to its success” The above demonstrates the treatment meted out to workers within the workplace.  They rapidly became machine minders blindly carrying out tasks to which no personal innovation was tolerated. This was technology with Victorian taskmaster perceptions once again.  Rowe (1990) in his arguments of Optimism/Pessimism within the workplace however says “Technology optimists maintain that it will not only remove repetitiveness from the managers role, but will allow greater participation in decision at all levels within the workplace.”  

Many authors have written on the evils of these megalithic ‘mainframes, and their effect upon working practices.  It is often stated that thousands of skilled workers in the finance industries lost their jobs, to the lower paid data entry typists.  Many of the older specialised departments (Finance, Audit etc.) within a corporation where dissolved.  Finance, purchase and ordering, stock control and some levels of management where to be controlled in future by centralised computers.  Many of its now former staff and workers soon found that other jobs where no longer available. The worst feature of this surplus pool of skilled labour was the concept of  ‘Ageism’.  Workers soon found that hiring companies where selecting only younger people (i.e. under 40 in many cases). Often this was a ruse, because at an earlier age, the new worker could be paid a much lower rate of pay etc.  For the next decade the use of the ‘Mainframe’ was seen as an ideal infrastructure.

The use of the ‘mainframe’ however had a short life in reality, as it disallowed management from taking any decisions that needed a short completion date for its success. The ‘centralisation’ lobby which had advocated that centralisation, was the way ahead began to realise that whilst long term financial planning was possible using the immense power of the ‘mainframe’, Lack of direct input from line managers charged with the day to day planning of basic core jobs where being stifled.  So much expertise was needed to run the ‘mainframe’ that line managers felt they had no input into it as a means of running their own sections.  This alienation reduced the incentive to move anywhere other than within the corporate framework, even if perceived profits from outside projects were possible.  Rowe (1990) makes good comment on this subject of ‘centralisation’ as opposed to ‘de-centralisation’ when he says: -

“The difference between the two involves a tension between efficiency and flexibility.  All organisations want to prove efficient while still remaining flexible, but these two concerns often stand opposed to each other.  Efficiency can be greatly enhanced by centralisation, for concentrating decision making in the hands of top executives improves co-ordination, maximises expertise, economises on managerial overheads, locates responsibility and involves fewer people.  Its weakness, however, is that as a strategy of control it can easily appear authoritarian and inflexible, may not always be available or appropriate, and can easily prove counter-productive”.

 De-centralisation however, comes out much better with most authors who see it as more flexible, allowing swifter decisions from those closer to the action: brings the profit motive to bear on a wider group. Rowe (1990) goes on to add “That decentralisation created greater motivation, wider democracy and more effective use of expertise”. The movement within the workplace moved rapidly from ‘dumb terminal’ input devices to the famous ‘One-per-desk’ whereby every man and his dog was given a computer linked into a ‘Local Area Network’ (LAN).  Workers where expected to cope with this new technology almost overnight.  Poor training says Copeland (1996) “Created stress and a feeling of inadequacy amongst the rank and file worker”. With hindsight, we can see that this is only one cross of many that the worker will have to endure.

Following de-centralisation, the once elite programmers themselves found their work skills demoted, Braverman (1984) says “The increasing availability of packaged software and high level languages, has lowered the status of the programmers. This is now extending to system analysts and computer managers, as hardware developments permit each manager, to have a personal computer that, he can manage and program to his personal advantage.” Therefore one can easily surmise that the workplace did alter in a dramatic way from what was thought of as unchangeable not to long ago.

However, the 1990s lovingly called the next phase ‘Downsizing’.  This new manager-speak name was probably the result of American corporate research analysts, who saw the self-powering IT Department with its expensive machines, a cost drain upon corporate profitability. ‘Downsizing’ was firstly profit orientated.  Staff salaries still being a major negative on any balance sheet.  Thus ‘Downsizing’ became yet another excuse for reducing the workforce, added to this was of course the reduction or even annihilation of the centralised IT departments.  The real reason could well be that workstations connected to a simple ‘ring’ network (LAN) was a very cheap alternative, to replacing the huge mainframes, which by the 90s where showing their age in speed and value. Large (1984) however says “The change from mainframes to miniframes and then to desktop computers was a result of the advances in speed and capability of the newer ‘Processor-Chips’ rather then anything else”.

The value of separate smaller machines also allowed software upgrades, as and when seemed profitable to increase effectiveness.   Added to this was the fact that employees could be increased, (or more often decreased), according to short-term goals and profits.  The poor employee was once again a pawn in the corporate game.  If you give an employee a desk computer connected to a ‘ring’ network, you could also spy on his/her work input and overall efficiency.  If you then make the ‘workstations’ available on a non-proprietary basis, (any desk, any computer) you can reduce to office worker to almost an automaton status, thus the concept of a person, as a simple cost-effective work unit becomes a reality. These ‘work-units’ can then be dovetailed into almost any corporate program at a predicted cost within the project.  Its effect upon the worker must be devastating, but the need to work meant its acceptance as the norm.  Service centres for major concerns are often built this way, in order to extract the maximum work from the minimum workforce.  It is not surprising that this sort of work has a high turnover of personnel, and the emergence of so called computer related diseases is rife.

Perhaps the biggest changes within the workplace have been firstly, the centralised ‘Service Call centres’ and ‘Teleworking’.

The ‘Service Call Centres’ workplace, is nowadays a growth industry? They usually consist of huge warehouse type room with sometimes dozens and dozens of computer controlled, (autorouters) telephones dealing with company or product support. The level of employee education is usually moderate, and thus the rate of pay is low. The typical service centre in the 1990s (i.e. BTs ‘Enquiries’ centre) Uses overhead projectors to display the average time of each operators call.  Alongside we have what management consider the ideal (always much less). The employee is therefore driven to work faster and faster.  The final straw was Zorichak (1999) pers. com. Who points out “That even the new ‘Service Centres’ which at present employ thousands of workers, (albeit female and lowly paid) could well go overseas to third world countries where costs are even lower”.  The secondary new 20th century workplace, is now the home, and the term ‘Tele-worker’ has been coined.

The use of a person’s home as a workplace is relatively new in the UK. In the U.S.A. Martin (1995) says “That the work extends across the spectrum from routine processing tasks, to advanced knowledge-intensive work. It must use high speed communication technology and increasingly cheaper computing power” In the UK, the Xerox Corporation sees six home workplace improvements that must be made before the home can be seen as an alternative to the traditional workplace.

1)       It must be adaptive rather then rigid.

2)       It must have lower overhead costs.

3)       It must enhance individual contributions

4)       It must enhance creativity.

5)       It must be organic and involve people.

6)       It must motivate the production of productive work.

It is interesting to note than all these things only mention what the worker can do for the company.  However it must be admitted that many routine copy-typing and database entry jobs could be made using ‘Tele-working’.  The likely workforce would be an ex-office worker at home with young children.  Single unattached people may well find that the social interaction available within an accepted office framework would not be available to home workers. (Social isolation etc.). A report from ‘Telecom Australia’ (1993) supports this statement, that people within a social structure (married) are usually much happier ‘Tele-working’ than single unattached workers.

A much loved idea is the belief that our workplace can be set up in any part of the world.  The perception by the multinationals is that we are all part of the ‘Global Village’. Unilever plc. advertising, shows its workers (One white, one Asian and one African) sitting in the forest happily communicating via a computer back to  head office. Thus propagating the idea that the workplace is nowadays, naturally world-wide.  UNESCO however, points out that over two thirds of the worlds population have never seen/used a common telephone belies this fact. Thus we must assume that the ‘Global Village’ as a workplace remains a concept of the western world.

Videoconferencing and purchasing from Internet sources are still in their infancy within the UK.  Most UK firms still prefer face to face meetings and purchasing from known proven sources. No doubt the interface between technology and the workplace will come even close in the next few years Technology is still moving forward at a rapid pace, and the average worker has to learn and apply new skills almost yearly, with little or no incentive to help them. The threat of dismissal if you don’t upgrade is a real threat.  Automation is on the increase and therefore many workplaces will need less and less workers to service its needs.  Any illnesses occurring due to computers or the office workload is usually seen by management as the workers fault etc, and any attempt to get financial benefits is vigorously fought. An interesting aside, is an advert in IT Magazine March 99 which now has books about the workplace with sub-headings of  ‘Legionnella Virus’, ‘Sick Building Syndrome’ ‘VDUs and illness in the Workplace’ etc. In conclusion, what can be said about the workplace in the 21st century?  If you compare the workplace conditions within the last 100 years as asked in this essay, the worker is hardly any better off now than then.   The ‘master’ drove the late Victorian era workplace directly.  The modern workplace is driven by the computer and the workplace no longer a place of secure employment.

Zorichak (1999) pers.com. Says “That labour displacement is the major form of distrust attributed to the introduction of new technology” Surely this statement must be seen to be a truism, at least this side of the year 2000.  Where work within the IT controlled workplaces are concerned, the workplace building is usually a large mega-office, with forced temperature control that remains constant.  This non-variant lulls ones body into a state of stupor after about eight hours.  The workplace still has the two opposing workforces. (Managers and line workers). The disparity in wage claim percentages causes endless dissatisfaction.  Workplace personnel are still regarded as ‘work-units’, and removal of their desks and their small personal space reduces their perceptions of self-value. 

            This essay must conclude finally that the workplace is still unchanged from that of earlier periods.  This essay as well, can find little or no reason to believe that the workplace will ever change in the favour of the worker, in the foreseeable future. What on earth will be left for our future generations within the workplace is difficult to predict.  One thing is certain; it will never be the employee, who, within the modern workplace will ever benefit.  The race by our biggest employers will always ensure that net profits outweigh the security in the workplace of the employee. 

REFERENCES.

Bell,D.(1974) The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society.(Heinemann, London).

Large,P. (1984)  Micro Revolution Re-visited. (Frances Pinter Press, New Jersey.)

Martin, W. (1995)  The Global Information Society. (Aslib-Gower Press, Aldershot,)

Rowe,C. (1992)  People and Chips. (Blackwell Pubs. London.)

  ibid,   Braverman,H.  (1984) Labour and Monopoly,Monthly Review Press, N.Y.

  ibid,   Taylor,F. (1980) Principles of Scientific Management. London.

  Ibid,   Toffler,A. (1981) The Third Way. Pan Books, London.

Forester,T.  (1989)  The Information Technology Revolution,(Blackwell,London)

Forester,T.  (1990)  Computers in the Human Context. (Blackwell, London)

Zorichak,Z (1999) Pers. Com. Lecture notes No. 3. (Information Society.)

BIBLIOGRAPHY.

Bell,D.  The Coming of the Post-Industrial Society. (Heinemann, London. 1974)

Boyle,C . People, Science, and Technology. (Wheatsheaf Books, New Jersey. 1984)

Collinbridge,D.  Social Control of Technology. (Open Univ. Milton Keynes.1980)

Forester,T.    The Information Technology Revolution,(Blackwell,London. 1989)

Forester,T.    Computers in the Human Context. (Blackwell, London. 1990)

Hoppen,T.  Generations. (Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1998)

Kiesler,S. Culture of the Internet. (Eribaum Assoc. New Jersey 1996)

Large,P.  Micro Revolution Re-visited. (Frances Pinter Press, New Jersey. 1984)

Martin,W.  The Global Information Society. (Aslib-Gower Press, Aldershot, 1995)

McKenzie,D.  Social Shaping of Technology. (Open Univ. Milton Keynes. 1985)

Mowshowitz,A  Conquest of Will. (Addison-Wesley Press. London. 1976)

Reader,A.  Information Technology & Society. (Sage Publishing. London 1995)

Rowe,C. People and Chips. (Blackwell Pubs. London 1992)

Stole,H. Cuckoo’s Egg. (Pan Books, London. 1990)

Wrench, W.  Disconnecetd   (Rutgers Univ. Press, New Jersey. 1996)

Wurman,R  Information Anxiety. (Pan Books, London. 1991)